JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 17, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Luis Enrique Olivera Petro

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Súplica Presentado Contra El Auto Proferido Por El Magistrado Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa El 14 De Octubre De 2005, En Virtud Del Cual Rechazó La Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad. Confirma El Auto De Rechazó De La Demanda
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. CONFIRMAR el Auto proferido por el Magistrado Manuel Jose Cepeda Espinosa el 14 de octubre de 2005, en virtud del cual rechazo la demanda presentada por Luis Enrique Olivera Petro.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.